System Partners Investment Application Process - NGB Feedback Survey

Page 1 of 3

Closes 2 Jun 2026

This service needs cookies enabled.

SPI Application Process Questionnaire

1. What is your Name?
2. Which NGB are you responding on behalf of?
3. What is your role within your NGB?
4. What is your email address?
5. Overall, the SPI application process was clear and proportionate to the funding being applied for.
(Required)
6. The guidance provided enabled us to understand what was required in each section of the application.
(Required)
7. The application timeline and deadline were reasonable for our organisation’s capacity.
(Required)
8. The distinction between the Participation and Performance strands was clear in the application requirements.
(Required)
9. The Excel-based elements (e.g., deliverables and cost breakdown) were workable and not overly complex.
(Required)
10. The Unique Deliverables Identifier (UDI) approach was clear and easy to apply in practice.
(Required)
11. The FAQs answered the questions we actually had while completing the application.
(Required)
12. It was clear what supporting evidence/documents we needed to submit (e.g., accounts, governance documents).
(Required)
13. Any support offered (email/queries/call-backs) was timely and helpful.
(Required)
14. We understood how our application would be assessed and what “good” looked like.
(Required)
15. The process felt fair and consistent across organisations.
(Required)
16. If we had to do it again, we would feel confident applying through the same process.
(Required)
17. What was the single biggest challenge/friction point in completing the SPI application?
18. What is the single most important improvement Sport NI could make to the SPI application process?
19. What should Sport NI stop doing in the SPI application process? What should Sport NI start doing? What worked well and should be retained?
20. Do you have any other comments?
21. Do you want to be contacted for a 1-on-1 to discuss any aspect of your response?